How long is sinister 2017

Crazy credits At the end of the credits, you can hear static immediately followed by a short tune of a child playing a piano. Similar to the piece heard on the Ham Radio during the movie. Connections Featured in FoundFlix: Sinister 2 User reviews Review. Top review. Solid but didn't live up. Not as good as the original but still an okay horror movie. Maybe if it didn't involve the kids so much the scenes could have been more graphic.

FAQ Do you need to see the first Sinister film to understand the second one? What type of movie camera is used in Sinister 2? Who is Ellison Oswalt? Details Edit. Release date August 21, United States. United States United Kingdom Canada. Official Facebook Official site. Sinister II. Kankakee, Illinois, USA. Box office Edit.

Technical specs Edit. Runtime 1 hour 37 minutes. Dolby Digital. Related news. Mar 19 DailyDead. Nov 2 MovieWeb. Contribute to this page Suggest an edit or add missing content. Top Gap. What is the Japanese language plot outline for Sinister 2 ?

This movie doesn't have like gore, sex, and pervasive language like most slasher movies have - it focuses on the intense suspension and the disturbing fact that children are abducted and manipulated by a demonic supernatural figure. There are scenes where the main character drinks whiskey during tense moments. Overall, Sinister in my opinion was a very good scary horror film that brings suprising twists and alot of suspense, which doesn't focus on the gore and sex. Adult Written by Nikeswoosh99 November 27, Well that was scary This movie has no purpose.

Most horror movies don't though. When I saw this it did scare me pretty good but it would have been more scary if I was alone. I have my bar set at pause for 14 years old, but if a child watches this movie with you the parent or friends it wouldn't be nearly as scary so I would say something along the lines of pause for There is no identifieable hero in this movie and the only questionable hero dies and his death is glorified. So this movie does seem to spend most of the time glorifying death with no hope for a hero.

Parent of a year-old Written by Tsion November 4, Very Scary I'm not a horror aficionado, but some of my favorite movies are from the horror genre The Shining, Alien, The Exorcist, etc. Sinister seemed genuinely scary and well-made, so I was intrigued from the moment I saw the preview. My feeling leaving the movie was mixed.

Sinister is very scary, so rest assured: if that's what you're looking for, you've come to the right place. It isn't nightmare-inducing so much as it is disturbing.

Sinister thrives in its vileness. Some horror movies are fun to watch, even the most scary ones. Sinister is not one of them. The movie is incredibly violent and disturbing, to a fault. You really FEEL the violence, since the majority of it is very graphic and is entirely perpetrated upon innocent families. Literally the first shot of the movie is a family of four mom, dad, and two young kids being hung from a tree.

We see them all thrash around until they die. Later, children and their parents are trapped duct-taped and tied down inside a car that is set on fire. Two parents have their throats slit bloodily on-screen in the same room as their children, who later meet the same fate just barely off-screen. Children are slowly drowned in a swimming pool, entirely on-screen.

A woman has her face mowed over with a lawn mower the split second before it hits her face, the camera cuts away. It's implied that her children and husband have the same thing happen to them. All of these murders are shown in "found" Super 8 footage, which makes them more realistic and haunting. A child prepares to chop up her family with an axe. We later see their blood splatted all over walls.

She's used the blood to draw pictures of their dismembered bodies. This all heightens the "scary" nature of the movie I personally wish that I hadn't seen the movie. It accomplishes what it sets out to accomplish, but by doing so, alienates its audience.

It isn't a "fun" movie night scary movie. It's something that, if shown to kids, could scar them for life. The continuing theme of the slaughter of innocent children was especially bothersome for me. I averted my eyes several times, and I'm not a squeamish person.

I can't imagine anybody "enjoying" this movie. Keep it away from your kids and teens at all costs, and think hard before watching it yourself. There are some things you can't un-see, even if you want to.

Sinister is one of them. Go to Common Sense Review. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Print. Personalize your media recommendations. How old is your kid? Have an account? Sign in. Thus begins the odyssey into the unknown. Let it be said at the outset that this is not "just another found footage film.

We don't spend two hours watching shaky 8MM footage. They are integral to the narrative but aren't the sum of its parts. In his horror debut, Hawke turns in a striking tour-de-force performance that rivals anything I've seen recently "Insidious'" Patrick Wilson comes close. Rylance is delightful as the patient but exasperated wife who's barely willing to stand by her man for one more moment. Arthur Branch and former U. Senator does a star turn as the stubborn sheriff who will have nothing to do with outsiders tarnishing his town's already-shaky reputation.

This is Ethan Hawke's first foray into this genre, a simple consequence of his passion for the material. The casting of Juliet Rylance as his wife was also done at his suggestion. Their on screen chemistry is undeniable. The technical team doesn't miss a beat. Top-notch visual effects are always key in a film like this, but the common flaw in this genre lies in overdoing it. CGI and post-production trickery can certainly advance the narrative where appropriate but "Sinister's" old school in-camera effects, done while shooting, enhance the believability of the action.

Cinematographer Chris Norr eschews hand-held for stationary tripod shots and Hitchcockian slow pans, with POV tracking shots that allow the audience to sense the protagonist's growing paranoia. The occasional subjective POV angle, where the character looks at the camera, effectively places the viewer into the scene.

Lighting in the Oswalt home, where most of the action takes place, is appropriately subdued and rife with interplays of light and shadow. Hawke is often seen in silhouette, masking dark corners hiding secrets, literally.

Terrifying night scenes beg the question, "Why are you going up into the attic? In a typical production, where third party songs will be inserted, the actors work to a temp track -- music that plays in the background until the company can obtain licensing for the tunes they want for the finished product, usually unknown although often hoped for during filming, that are then added to the soundtrack in post-production.

With "Sinister," Derrickson and his team were able to purchase the rights prior to shooting so the cast members performed to a playback of the songs that would actually be used in the final cut. It does make a difference, especially when seasoned professionals like Hawke are "acting" in sync with the same music the audience hears in those scenes.

It creates a symbiotic ambiance that links viewer to actor. As a reviewer, I try to keep expectations out of my thoughts and writing. After all, it's only fair to the filmmakers and me, and my readers to judge a movie on its merits. Fortunately, it's not too much of a challenge to be as objective as possible when entering the theater, especially if it's a premiere and no other reviews are out there and you haven't watched a trailer.

But Fantastic Fest is a genre festival, after all, and one would not attend, theoretically, without being a fan of same. So expectations are placed on the film simply by virtue of the fact it's even being shown. That's why I'm happy to report that "Sinister" was all I hoped it would be.

Yes, this is why I attend Fantastic Fest and movies like this make it worth the trip. This is the flick for jaded horror fans who think nothing can scare them. This one does it. FAQ Why was Vincent D'Onofrio uncredited?