When was leo frank lynched

Congressional Action. House Resolution H. Legislation Expressing U. Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. Federal Initiatives Against Hate Crimes. Statistics on Religious Hate Crimes. Federal Action. State Department Definition of Anti-Semitism. Hate Crimes FBI. Shootings Targeting American Jews. Archived Reports. Hate Groups in the U. Americans Reacts to Damascus Blood Libel.

Anti-Semitic Propensities Among Americans. The International Jew. On the University Campus. Charles Coughlin. Henry Ford. Frank, the last to admit seeing Mary alive, became the prime suspect. Rumor circulated that Mary had been sexually assaulted. Factory employees offered apparently false testimony that Frank had made sexual advances toward them. The madam of a house of ill repute claimed that Frank had phoned her several times, seeking a room for himself and a young girl.

For the grand jury, Hugh Dorsey painted Leo Frank as a sexual pervert who was both homosexual and who preyed on young girls. What he did not tell the grand jury was that a janitor at the factory, Jim Conley, had been arrested two days after Frank when he was seen washing blood off his shirt. In August of , the jury found Frank guilty in less than four hours. Trial and Lynching of Leo Frank: Topics in Chronicling America This guide provides resources on the topic of the "trial and lynching of Leo Frank" found in the Chronicling America digital collection of historic newspapers.

About Chronicling America Chronicling America is a searchable digital collection of historic newspaper pages from sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Library of Congress.

Included in the website is the Directory of US Newspapers in American Libraries , a searchable index to newspapers published in the United States since , which helps researchers identify what titles exist for a specific place and time, and how to access them.

Introduction Sketch of Leo M. Frank and Mary Phagan. March 12, Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers. They surrounded the courthouse, cheered the prosecutor as he entered and exited the building each day, and celebrated wildly when the jurors, after twenty-five days of trial, found Frank guilty. Ultimately the U. Thomas E. Watson , a former Populist and the publisher of the Jeffersonian , had conducted a campaign denouncing Frank that struck a chord, and Georgians responded to it.

As Watson continued to fan the flames of public outrage, his readership grew. Slaton reviewed more than 10, pages of documents, visited the pencil factory where the murder had taken place, and finally decided that Frank was innocent. The governor declared martial law and called out the National Guard. Only months later, many of these same men would take part in the nighttime ceremony at Stone Mountain that established the modern Ku Klux Klan.

Workers resented being exploited by northern factory owners who had come south to reorganize a declining agrarian economy. It struck fear in Jewish southerners, causing them to monitor their behavior in the region closely for the next fifty years—until the civil rights movement led to more significant changes. Frank a Pardon. For those who thought Frank innocent, this provided confirmation; for those who believed him guilty, this was insufficient evidence to change their views. The case inspired several scholarly treatments by historians and also made its way, through various media, into the popular culture.

Dinnerstein, Leonard. Dinnerstein, L. Leo Frank Case. In New Georgia Encyclopedia.